Changing unit pricing structure

Recent

Hottest

Forum Index » New Feature Request

Author

Message

Apr 14, 2017 04:22

Subject: Changing unit pricing structure

copeab

Messages: 31,
Joined: Jun 25, 2014,
Offline

To put it simply, since bases give credits in increments of 25, unit pricing should use increments of 25.

Cost is one way to balance units and this allows more fine tuning. For example, dropping the mantisse to 225 and raising the salamander to 225 would better balance the three amphibians, without otherwise nerfing or buffing them.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Apr 15, 2017 03:12

Apr 14, 2017 10:28

Subject: Changing unit pricing structure

LkASr

Messages: 752,
Joined: Sep 24, 2015,
Offline

I'd stick to the 50 credit increments. I've played a game with some units with that increment, didn't work out too well imo

Never surrender when you still have the chance.
"I have achieved navel superiority" -myself 2017
All the good stuff

[WoT Generals Beta Tester, Uniwar Beta Tester, Vainglory Hero Suggestions List Contributor]
Come look at my profile for more info

Apr 14, 2017 16:49

Subject: Changing unit pricing structure

copeab

Messages: 31,
Joined: Jun 25, 2014,
Offline

LkASr wrote:I'd stick to the 50 credit increments. I've played a game with some units with that increment, didn't work out too well imo

I don't see how it would cause problems. I've played games where unit costs were in increments of 1 and it worked very well.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at Apr 15, 2017 03:17

Apr 15, 2017 03:46

Subject: Changing unit pricing structure

OmegaD

Messages: 30,
Joined: Dec 11, 2016,
Offline

copeab wrote: dropping the mantisse to 225 and raising the salamander to 225 would better balance the three amphibians

I agree.

Apr 15, 2017 09:11

Subject: Changing unit pricing structure

Pento

Messages: 97,
Joined: Feb 14, 2017,
Offline

copeab wrote:To put it simply, since bases give credits in increments of 25, unit pricing should use increments of 25.

Cost is one way to balance units and this allows more fine tuning.

I agree!

Apr 15, 2017 09:23

Subject: Changing unit pricing structure

Pento

Messages: 97,
Joined: Feb 14, 2017,
Offline

copeab wrote:To put it simply, since bases give credits in increments of 25, unit pricing should use increments of 25.

Cost is one way to balance units and this allows more fine tuning.

I agree!

Apr 17, 2017 04:41

Subject: Re:Changing unit pricing structure

eathan

Messages: 19,
Joined: Jan 14, 2017,
Offline

I agree, except for the raising of the price on salamander. Mantisse, sure, but not the no range salamander.

Apr 18, 2017 05:58

Subject: Re:Changing unit pricing structure

LexTalionis

Messages: 16,
Joined: Mar 21, 2017,
Offline

mantisse is quite strong for its price versus other amphibious units. Price doesn't need to be decreased, unless it loses movement like the fuze did so it can't cap from 3 spaces away.

Apr 19, 2017 05:03

Subject: Re:Changing unit pricing structure

Pento

Messages: 97,
Joined: Feb 14, 2017,
Offline

I thought the topic is about the price structure in general and not only about the price structure of the Mantisse.

Forum Index » New Feature Request