acebravo
Messages: 6,
Joined: Feb 08, 2011,
Offline
|
|
acebravo
Messages: 6,
Joined: Feb 08, 2011,
Offline
|
Acebravo vs BLANK.. Does this mean I get a bye thru round 1?
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
so long game
4 hours and only 3 raunds....Think we should have 3 minutes games for tournament
|
|
rwieczor84
Messages: 184,
Joined: Dec 24, 2010,
Offline
|
|
rwieczor84
Messages: 184,
Joined: Dec 24, 2010,
Offline
|
you said you are always online but i am waiting, and waiting for your move
3 minutes? insane!
|
|
Cpt Hawaiian
Messages: 199,
Joined: Sep 12, 2010,
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Offline
|
|
Cpt Hawaiian
Messages: 199,
Joined: Sep 12, 2010,
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Offline
|
I haven't even started yet. Sewardsfolly, you there?
A couple questions:
Are we to play both matches simultaneously?
And what is the official "end match" time for next week?
Thanks
|
---------------------------------------
MODERATOR has spoken. |
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
go-go!
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
i think, that rules not very good.
See, for example, this are screens of my too tournament matches:
You see, that i already win in both this games (i already got opponent base in 3-4raunds and soon he will be completely beaten).
But now, FOR EXAMPLE, my opponent can do one turn during 12 hours and we cant finish this games because starvation map is too big and it needed a lot of turns to get ALL bases. So we both will be removed from tournament by rules. Is it fair?!
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at Dec 30, 2011 03:42
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
May be we should do something to make players move more faster: 15 turns in a day minimum. This is tournament, not sleeping room
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
is anybody here?
Tournament need more information and advertising support, or it will be boring
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
new reporting from the battlefield:
One game:
Next game:
It was hard battle and my opponent was strong and brave. Good games
|
|
Cpt Hawaiian
Messages: 199,
Joined: Sep 12, 2010,
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Offline
|
|
Cpt Hawaiian
Messages: 199,
Joined: Sep 12, 2010,
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Offline
|
nice posts. i am probably going to be dq'd because i haven't even started mine yet. sent invite, but no response.
|
---------------------------------------
MODERATOR has spoken. |
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
Cpt Hawaiian wrote: nice posts. i am probably going to be dq'd because i haven't even started mine yet. sent invite, but no response.
bad
not good tournament organization
Think, your opponent should be removed and you will get technical winning
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
And a few comments on the organization of the tournament.
The Draw. Definition of pairs of players. This is a very important part of the tournament and it must necessarily be based on randomization.
Randomizatio n procedure must be absolutely transparent and obvious to all participants in the tournament. We have not seen it. We were simply assigned in pairs. This is not correct.
Second. The tournament is already underway, and we do not have even a complete list of participants.
On the part of the tournament organizers would like a more serious attitude to the tournament
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
samuraj wrote: And a few comments on the organization of the tournament.
The Draw. Definition of pairs of players. This is a very important part of the tournament and it must necessarily be based on randomization.
Randomizatio n procedure must be absolutely transparent and obvious to all participants in the tournament. We have not seen it. We were simply assigned in pairs. This is not correct.
Second. The tournament is already underway, and we do not have even a complete list of participants.
On the part of the tournament organizers would like a more serious attitude to the tournament
|
|
dlem
Messages: 2,
Joined: Apr 06, 2011,
Offline
|
|
dlem
Messages: 2,
Joined: Apr 06, 2011,
Offline
|
Wooh I am getting owned...
But one question. We play Sap vs. Sap. I am capturing a base with a 9p Marine.
He attacks me down the hill with a 3p Marine and my Marine looses 1 point.
Then he attacks my marine again with a 10p Helicopter with +1 bonus and my Marine dies. Is that possible? Down from 8 to 0 while capturing a base?
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
|
samuraj
Messages: 36,
Joined: Dec 29, 2011,
Offline
|
dlem wrote: Wooh I am getting owned...
But one question. We play Sap vs. Sap. I am capturing a base with a 9p Marine.
He attacks me down the hill with a 3p Marine and my Marine looses 1 point.
Then he attacks my marine again with a 10p Helicopter with +1 bonus and my Marine dies. Is that possible? Down from 8 to 0 while capturing a base?
possible
|
|
|
|